ADAM ROBERT RITZER

ADAM ROBERT RITZER is currently employed as a Broker and/or Investment Adviser at R.W.PRESSPRICH & CO. located at 452 FIFTH AVENUE, NEW YORK, NY, 10018.

ADAM ROBERT RITZER has worked at R.W.PRESSPRICH & CO. since October 12, 2011

Disclosure History

ADAM ROBERT RITZER has 9 Disclosure Event(s).

Date: October 12, 2012
Category: Regulatory

Date: April 13, 2011
Category: Employment Separation After Allegations
Firm Name: CRT CAPITAL GROUP LLC
Termination Type: Permitted to Resign
Allegations: FAILURE TO TIMELY REPORT DISCLOSABLE EVENTS IN VIOLATION OF FIRM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES AND INDUSTRY RULES.
Broker Comment: MR RITZER WAS UNAWARE OF HIS THE REQUIREMENT TO DISCLOSE A DOMESTIC DISPUTE. THE CHARGES HAVE SINCE BEEN DISMISSED.

Date: March 30, 2011
Category: Criminal
Charges: VIOLATION OF PROTECTIVE ORDER
Disposition: Amended
Amended Charges: VIOLATION OF CONDITIONS OF RELEASE
Amended Charge Type: MISDEMEANOR Amended Charge
Amended Charge Disposition: Pled guilty

Date: December 13, 2010
Category: Criminal
Charges: PROTECTIVE ORDER VIOLATION
Disposition: Amended
Amended Charges: VIOLATION OF CONDITION OF RELEASE
Amended Charge Type: MISDEMEANOR Amended Charge
Amended Charge Disposition: Pled guilty

Date: December 04, 2008
Category: Criminal
Charges: STRANGULATION SECOND DEGREE
Disposition: Dismissed

Date: June 30, 1999
Category: Customer Dispute
Allegations: CLIENT ALLEGES THAT ADAM RITZER ENTERED TRADES WITHOUT HIS AUTHORIZATION AND CHURNED HIS ACCOUNT. DAMAGES ALLEGED TO BE BETWEEN $4,000 AND $6,000
Damage Amount Requested: $6,000.00

Date: September 08, 1995
Category: Customer Dispute
Allegations: CLAIMANT ALLEGE THAT RITZER CONTINUED TO HOLDIN THEIR ACCOUNTS CERTAIN UNSUITABLE INVESTMENTS IN EASTERNAIRLINES AND PAN AM BONDS THAT WERE PURCHASED WHEN MR. RITZERWAS AT SHEARSON. CLAIMANTS ALSO ALLEGE THAT HE CONTINUED TO ADDTO THOSE POSITIONS WHILE AT OPPENHEIMER. DAMAGES ARE ALLEGED TOBE $142,400.00.
Damage Amount Requested: $178,000.00
Settlement Amount: $31,000.00
Broker Comment: CLAIMS AGAINST SMITH BARNEY SETTLED FOR$31,000.00.Not Provided

Date: May 13, 1994
Category: Customer Dispute
Allegations: EXCESSIVE TRADING: SUITABILITY: ALLEGEDDAMAGES $86,000.00: PUNITIVE $500,000.00
Damage Amount Requested: $86,000.00
Settlement Amount: $29,500.00
Broker Comment: THE CASE WAS SETTLED FOR $29,500.00 TO AVOID THETIME RISK AND EXPENSE OF TRYING THE CASE. I WILL CONTRIBUTE$2,000.00 TO THE SETTLEMENT.I HAVE AGREED TO SETTLE THE CASE FOR $2,000 TOAVOID THE COST OF HIRING AN ATTORNEY TO ARBITRATE THE CASE FORME.

Date: September 04, 1991
Category: Customer Dispute
Allegations: NEGLIGENCE, FRAUD, EXCESSIVE TRADING,SUITABILITY, UNAUTHORIZED TRADING. ALLEGED DAMAGES OF$495,209.00
Damage Amount Requested: $90,000.00
Settlement Amount: $45,000.00
Broker Comment: THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF UNSUITABILITY,MISREPRESENTATION OR EXCESSIVE TRADING AT OPPENHEIMER, IN FACT,AT OPPENHEIMER, CLAIMANT'S LOSSES WERE OCCASIONED BY MARGINLIQUIDATIONS OF AIRLINE STOCK WHICH DECLINED PRECIPITIOUSLYDURING THE PERSIAN GULF WAR. CLAIMANT INDICATED A NET WORTH OF$1.0 MILLION & ANNUAL INCOME OF $100,000 & INVESTMENT OBJECTIVEOF "TRADING SHORT TERM." IN ORDER TO AVOID THE COSTS ANDUNCERTAINTIES OF LITIGATION. THE MATTER WAS SETTLED FOR $35,000AND THE DEBIT BALANCE IN CLAIMANT'S ACCOUNT ($45,000) WASWRITTEN OFF.CUSTOMER WAS ENGAGING IN SPECULATIVE TRADINGTACTICS FOR YEARS PRIOR TO OUR RELATIONSHIP. CUSTOMER HAD O.K.ON EVERY TRADE NO UNAUTHORIZED TRADING. CUSTOMER HAD POSITIONSIN STOCKS OR SECURITIES OPPENHEIMER HAD RECOMENDATIONS ON. ALLTRADES WAS SUITABLE BASED ON HIS OBJECTIVES. MATTER WAS SETTLEDFOR SIGNIFICANTLY LESS THAN ASKED.

More Information

All individuals registered to sell securities or provide investment advice are required to disclose customer complaints and arbitrations, regulatory actions, employment terminations, bankruptcy filings and criminal or civil judicial proceedings.

A disclosure includes information about customer disputes, disciplinary events and financial matters on the broker's record as reported by securities regulators, the individual broker, and any involved firms. Some of these items may involve pending actions or allegations that have not been resolved or proven. The presence of a disclosure does not automatically indicate any wrongdoing.

BrokerCheck is the source of the data included in this Report. The data was compiled on June 29, 2018.

To view the full report for ADAM ROBERT RITZER, click here.

The use of BrokerCheck data is subject to the BrokerCheck Terms of Use.