PETER LUCINA

PETER LUCINA is currently employed as a Broker and/or Investment Adviser at LASALLE ST SECURITIES, L.L.C. located at 940 N. INDUSTRIAL DR., ELMHURST, IL, 60126-1131.

PETER LUCINA has worked at LASALLE ST SECURITIES, L.L.C. since July 13, 1996

Disclosure History

PETER LUCINA has 5 Disclosure Event(s).

Date: April 15, 2002
Category: Customer Dispute
Allegations: AELLEGES UNSUITABLE INVESTMENT IN A PRIVATE PLACEMENT.
Damage Amount Requested: $110,000.00
Settlement Amount: $10,000.00
Broker Comment: RESPONDENT LUCINA STATES THAT HE WAS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FROM THIS ARBITRATION BY LASALLE ST. SECURITIES AND CLAIMANT AS A CONDITION OF THE SETTLEMENT.

Date: October 28, 1996
Category: Customer Dispute
Allegations: CLAIMANT [CUSTOMER] ALLEGED UNAUTHROIZED TRADINGIN HIS ACCOUNT.
Damage Amount Requested: $193,000.00 Damages Granted: $20,000.00
Broker Comment: RESPONDENTS [THIRD PARTY] AND PETERLUSINA ARE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY LIABLE FOR AND SHALL PAY TOCLAIMANT [CUSTOMER] COMPENSATORY DAMAGES OF TWENTY THOUSANDDOLLARS. THE CLIAMS FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES WERE DISMISSED ANDDENIED.NOT PROVIDED

Date: May 15, 1995
Category: Customer Dispute
Allegations: CUSTOMER ALLEGED UNSUITABILITY, CHURNING,WITH DAMAGES IN THE AMOUNT OF $312,000
Damage Amount Requested: $312,000.00
Settlement Amount: $10,000.00
Broker Comment: AGREED TO SETTLE THIS MATTER ON THE ADVICE OFCOUNSEL GIVEN THE COST AND UNCERTAINTY OF LITIGATION. ICONTRIBUTED $5,000 TO THE TOTAL SETTLEMENT OF $10,000Not Provided

Date: May 13, 1993
Category: Regulatory
Initiated By: INDIANA SECURITIES DIVISION
Allegations: THE INDIANA SECURITIES DIVISION ALLEGES THATCHRISTOPHER JAMES HOLTKAMP AND PETER LUCINA ENTERED INTOAGREEMENT WITHOUT ADMITTING TO VIOLATIONS. BOTH HAVE AGREED TOPAY RESTITUTION TO COMPLAINANT.
Resolution: Consent SanctionDetails:
Sanctions: Disgorgement/Restitution Sanction Details: PAYMENT OF RESTITUTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,852.50AND COST OF INVESTIGATION OF $1,500.00 AND ARE SUBJECT TO A 1YEAR PERIOD TO STRICTER SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES JOINTLY ANDSEVERALLY.
Broker Comment: RESPONDENT WOULD MAINTAIN THAT NO VIOLATION OFANY KIND OCCURRED IN RELATION TO THE JONES ACCOUNT.

Date: July 10, 1992
Category: Employment Separation After Allegations
Firm Name: J.W. GANT
Termination Type: Permitted to Resign
Allegations: SEQUENCE #169-19092J.W. GANT ALLEGED THAT I WAS TERMINATED FROMMY JOB FATHER THAN RESIGNING.
Broker Comment: UNKNOWN; INVESTIGATATION CONTINUESJ.W. GANTS POSITION THAT I WAS TERMINATED AND/ORREPORTING THAT I WAS TERMINATED IS COMPLETELY FALSE. MYSELF ANDMOST OF THE OFFICE RESIGNED DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE WORKINGCONDITIONS WERE UNSATISFACTORY AND NOT CONDUCIVE TO FAVORABLECLIENT RELATIONS. SPECIFICALLY, THE COMPANY WAS BEINGEMBEZZLED, WITHOUT OUR KNOWLEDGE BY OUR OWNER AND CEO FRANKPALUMBO. WHEN THIS BECAME PUBLIC IT WAS VIRTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE TOTRADE, IN ADDITION TO NASD RESTRICTION WHICH FURTHER RESTRICTEDOUR TRADING. THOSE CONDITIONS NECESSITATED THAT WE RESIGN INORDER TO PROTECT OUR CLIENTS AND OURSELVES.

More Information

All individuals registered to sell securities or provide investment advice are required to disclose customer complaints and arbitrations, regulatory actions, employment terminations, bankruptcy filings and criminal or civil judicial proceedings.

A disclosure includes information about customer disputes, disciplinary events and financial matters on the broker's record as reported by securities regulators, the individual broker, and any involved firms. Some of these items may involve pending actions or allegations that have not been resolved or proven. The presence of a disclosure does not automatically indicate any wrongdoing.

BrokerCheck is the source of the data included in this Report. The data was compiled on June 29, 2018.

To view the full report for PETER LUCINA, click here.

The use of BrokerCheck data is subject to the BrokerCheck Terms of Use.